Most investors know they should "research a stock" before buying. Fewer know exactly what to look at. The three most important valuation ratios — price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), and earnings per share (EPS) — each answer a different question about what a stock is worth and why. Used together, they form a complete first-pass analysis framework. Used in isolation, each one can mislead.

Step 1: Earnings Per Share (EPS) — The Foundation

EPS = net income ÷ diluted shares outstanding. It's the single most important bottom-line number for stock analysis. When you buy a share of stock, you are buying a proportional claim on the company's earnings — and EPS tells you exactly how much earnings that claim represents per share.

Always use diluted EPS, not basic EPS. Diluted EPS includes all potentially dilutive securities — stock options, warrants, convertible debt — and represents the worst-case earnings per share assuming all those securities are converted. For tech companies with heavy stock-based compensation, diluted EPS can be meaningfully lower than basic EPS.

Trailing vs. Forward EPS: Trailing EPS uses the last 12 months of actual reported earnings (reliable, backward-looking). Forward EPS uses analyst consensus estimates for the next 12 months (more relevant for fast-growers, but subject to forecast error). Use trailing for stable companies; forward when current earnings dramatically understate near-future earnings power due to growth.

EPS growth rate is what drives long-run stock returns. A company growing EPS at 15%/year will double earnings in ~5 years; at 10%/year, in ~7 years. The EPS growth calculator projects future EPS at any growth rate and shows the implied stock price at a given exit P/E multiple.

Step 2: Price-to-Earnings (P/E) — What You're Paying

P/E = stock price ÷ EPS. It tells you how much the market pays for each dollar of earnings. A P/E of 20 means $20 paid per $1 of annual earnings. This is the most widely used valuation metric and the starting point for nearly all stock analysis.

The S&P 500 long-run average P/E is approximately 15–17x, but context matters enormously:

  • Interest rates: When rates are low, future earnings are worth more in present value terms, supporting higher P/E multiples. The 2010–2020 period of near-zero rates contributed to 22–25x average market P/E. When rates rise, P/E multiples tend to compress.
  • Sector: Technology companies trade at 25–35x P/E because they grow faster and have higher margins. Banks trade at 12–15x because their earnings are more cyclical. Always compare P/E within the same sector.
  • Growth rate: A 30x P/E on a company growing EPS at 30%/year can be cheaper than a 15x P/E on a company growing at 5%/year. Use the PEG ratio to normalize for growth.

Use the P/E ratio calculator to compare a stock's multiple to sector averages, see the PEG ratio, and find the implied fair price at multiple P/E targets (12x, 17x, 20x, 25x).

Step 3: The PEG Ratio — P/E Adjusted for Growth

PEG = P/E ÷ annual EPS growth rate. Peter Lynch popularized this ratio as a quick way to check whether a stock's multiple is justified by its growth. A PEG of 1.0 is roughly "fair value" — you're paying one dollar of multiple for each percentage point of growth. PEG below 1.0 may signal undervaluation; PEG above 2.0 may indicate you're overpaying for growth.

Example: Stock A has a P/E of 28x and grows EPS at 28% per year → PEG = 1.0. Stock B has a P/E of 15x and grows EPS at 5% per year → PEG = 3.0. Despite the lower P/E, Stock B is more expensive on a growth-adjusted basis.

PEG works best for mid-growth companies (10%–30% EPS growth). It's less reliable for very high-growth companies (40%+, where PEG near 1.0 may still be expensive) and for no-growth value stocks (where PEG becomes meaningless).

Step 4: Price-to-Book (P/B) — What the Balance Sheet Says

P/B = stock price ÷ book value per share. Book value is total shareholder equity divided by shares outstanding — what shareholders would theoretically receive if the company were liquidated. P/B tells you how much premium the market assigns above accounting net worth.

P/B is most useful for asset-heavy businesses: banks, insurance, real estate, utilities, manufacturers. For these companies, the balance sheet closely tracks economic value. A bank trading at 0.8x P/B is trading below its accounting net worth — which could mean deep value or concerns about asset quality.

P/B is less useful for asset-light businesses (software, consulting, consumer brands) where most of the value is in IP, brand, and customer relationships that don't appear on a GAAP balance sheet at market value. A software company at 15x P/B can be entirely reasonable.

The most useful signal: ROE vs. P/B. A company earning 25% return on equity deserves a higher P/B than one earning 8%. The formula: fair P/B ≈ ROE ÷ required return. If you require 10% and the company earns 20% ROE, a 2.0x P/B is fair. Use the price-to-book calculator to compute the Graham Number and ROE-implied fair P/B.

Putting It Together: A 3-Ratio Framework

Signal EPS P/E / PEG P/B + ROE Interpretation
Growth compounder↑↑High P/E, low PEGHigh P/B, high ROEPremium justified by earnings growth + quality
Value opportunityStableLow P/E, low PEGLow P/B vs. ROEPotential undervaluation; check earnings trend
Value trapLow P/E (looks cheap)Low P/B, declining ROEEarnings deteriorating; "cheap" gets cheaper
Speculative excessNegativeN/A (no earnings)Very high P/BStory-driven valuation; high risk, use P/S instead
No single ratio tells the full story. A stock can look cheap on P/E and expensive on P/B simultaneously — which ratio matters more depends on whether the business is asset-heavy (P/B is key) or earnings-driven (P/E is key). A growth stock may look expensive on both but be entirely reasonable once you factor in the PEG ratio. Always use at least two ratios together, and always compare within the same sector.

For a deeper dive into what makes a P/E "good" or "expensive" across different market environments, the P/E ratio guide covers sector benchmarks and historical S&P 500 averages in detail. And for the growth vs. value investing debate — when does each style outperform, and how do you decide which approach fits your portfolio? — see the growth vs. value investing guide.